Christmas is the season of goodwill and can be a successful time of the year for charity fundraising. But how do small, local charities make the most out of Christmas?
McQueenie Mulholland helps charities raise funds to continue the great work they do in communities around the UK. A significant part of this income comes from grants; often from local authorities due to the support these organisations provide to the public.
This got us thinking: Are there any trends in how local authority funds are allocated to voluntary, community and social enterprises? And could these trends be helpful in informing the tactics these organisations use in the targeting grants from local authorities?
Using our local County Council (Devon), an authority committed to transparency and that publishes data related to grant distribution under the Open Government License, we analysed data on grants to the voluntary, community and social enterprise sector over 2014 to see what trends exist.
These are our key findings:
- Most grants were between £1 and £1,000. This accounted for 431 grants - over 55% of all grants.
- Grants of £1 to £1000 only however account for 6% of the value of all money awarded.
- If we look at grants between £1 and £6,000, They represent nearly 90% of the total number of grants awarded but only account for 24% of the total value.
- +£100,000 grants account for just 0.51% of the total number but makes up 27% of the total value.
- The data showed distribution peaks at £10,000, £15,000 and £20,000 award levels - this shows more interest in larger projects with round numbers.
To summarise the data: If your organisation is thinking of making a bid for a local authority grant it would be wise to aim low in the value you’re seeking (between £1 and £6,000). It was awards of this level that made up the majority of successful bids.
If your project requires more support you may want to consider aiming for a round number of £10,000, £15,000 or £20,000, as there were definite peaks in the number of grants awarded at these very specific higher levels.
Written by: Rob Mulholland
Data Analysis by: Anthoney Strowger
In our work with charities (especially smaller ones) we see a lot of concern and reluctance to ask clients, who benefit from an organisation's services, for donations. It's understandable and we recommend that all charities consider key client demographic attributes before developing client-focused fundraising strategies.
Recently, after analysing its client database and concluding its clients were suitable for a fundraising 'ask', a charity we've been working with decided to embark on such a test.
However, rather than just focus on the obvious, we proposed the charity test not just asking for a donation but also testing the channels in which it used to do so. In doing so, we opted to test post versus email versus telephone all of which would utilise the same creative proposition (a client feedback survey) and fundraising ask - the results were compelling.
Below is an infographic that gives the basic headline results of our test, from which we learnt:
1) This charity's clients are willing and able to give donations - 18.8% said they would do so.
2) While telephone performed the best in terms of clients completing the survey (26.7% did so), telephone also performed the worst in terms of actual donations received (0% - possibly due to the recent scandal and mistrust of telephone fundraising)
3) Email and post had equally the same number of donations but email out performed post in terms of the average donation value (£20 compared with £10 respectively)
4) Due to its non-tangible quality, email by far out performed post in terms of Return On Investment - with a positive ROI of 6.7 to 1.
As a result of this work McQueenie Mulholland is now developing a second test for the charity and re-examining its digital strategy for both fundraising and communications objectives.